Listening to the anti-women rantings of republicans and the email Clinton saga really has me down on this Presidential election thing.
Really? In 2015 you can proclaim you're going to strip the rights of women and steer our nation towards the control of the fundamentalist religions and get elected? What happened to freedom of religion and thoughts? I thought we were at war with ideology and rebels that dictated and dominated folks with their own religious values.
While this screaming level of rhetoric challenges our social tolerant values, the spill of this hate and motivated violence is seeping through the cracks of our social fabric, causing harm and polarity that could jeopardize us all. We must all be careful on personalizing our frustration and taking aim at select groups with our own view of justice.
There is a big difference of having a robust discussion of governance policy and those that take aim at their political villains, spouting evil doings and a harsh personal tone. I know these political debates about abortion, immigration, and governmental communication protocols are not meant to spur criminal and physical reaction throughout our public, but as frustration grows within supporters of these aggressive views, I would suggest violence becomes more rational to everyday citizens.
I am hoping we can turn down the personal attacks and accusations on fellow politicians and citizens. While there is much work to be done and many issues to resolve, we must always put civility first before we resort to violent speech or actions in support of our great nation. As we focus attentions on the intolerance, hate, and barbaric actions of foreign fundamentalists, we must not lose focus on the tone and actions within our country. One only has to look at world history to determine what could be our future.
Sunday, August 23, 2015
Thursday, August 13, 2015
Stand up for Rt. 53 or Sit Down!
I would like to know which fellow Lake County Board Members support increasing the taxes and fees on Lake County Residents. I recently asked Chairman Aaron Lawlor to place the discussion of a 4 cent a gallon Lake County Gas Tax on a committee agenda to discuss and get a vote on the Lake County Boards position. It is my understanding that a new tollway plaza in the proximity of the old Deerfield Road has been proposed along with the increase of tolls prices.
During my political career I have voted against the Route 53 extension mostly because of my stance against suburban sprawl and my position on retention of our green assets. If given the opportunity, I will Vote Against this proposal again, not only because of my general belief concerning suburban sprawl and the future of Lake County , but also because We should not be raising taxes and fees on our residents.
Not only will the 4 cents hit us in our pockets, increased fees and tolls will push cars and trucks off the 294 tollway and onto route 41, causing dangerous and increased traffic for our eastern Lake County residents.
During my political career I have voted against the Route 53 extension mostly because of my stance against suburban sprawl and my position on retention of our green assets. If given the opportunity, I will Vote Against this proposal again, not only because of my general belief concerning suburban sprawl and the future of Lake County , but also because We should not be raising taxes and fees on our residents.
Not only will the 4 cents hit us in our pockets, increased fees and tolls will push cars and trucks off the 294 tollway and onto route 41, causing dangerous and increased traffic for our eastern Lake County residents.
With a majority of the Lake County Board seats up for election in 2016, I think it is incumbent on the candidates to voice their position on these taxes and fees prior to the filing deadline for the 2016 election. We need to have this discussion soon since the Lake County Board has never taken a position on these increases in taxes and fees and the viability of the Route 53 plan is based on an acceptable and valid financial plan.
Sunday, August 09, 2015
Let's Bring People Together, Not Divide
Saying we should bring people together and not be dividers is a good objective and should result in positive warm cozy feelings. But that alone does not do a thing for creative and sensitive solutions for the problems we face today in our world. I love folks that go out and proclaim they will bring people together and unite us. For What? If the majority of government has old fashion ideas, what good does unification and good feelings help its citizenry. What unified solutions will they move forward? When I support citizens for public office, I expect strong constructive results that help facilitate a good life for my family and community. Considerations, good intentions, sweet talkin, and all the schmaltz in the world really does not mean a thing when it comes to creating good government. We must challenge the status quo to be successful.
The methodology and delivery of many of us out there in the political world has not been as smooth and gentle as we might hope. Working on reduction of inefficiencies and consolidating redundant operations that maintain the core services IS what I expect our representatives to focus on. The lack of participation on these efforts does cause frustration, anger, and strains the ideology of peace, love, and harmony. But when you are confronted with a posse of mediocrity one needs to shake it up, speak up, and cause a little pain or you're not doing your job.
I would suggest we all keep open minds and LISTEN to the substance of the discussion in politics and not as much on the delivery and appearance. While I know that political marketing, mob spin, the press, and our wonderful leaders have a tone and an specified bandwidth we should fall all within, breakout and rise above the noise to comprehend the Substance.
The methodology and delivery of many of us out there in the political world has not been as smooth and gentle as we might hope. Working on reduction of inefficiencies and consolidating redundant operations that maintain the core services IS what I expect our representatives to focus on. The lack of participation on these efforts does cause frustration, anger, and strains the ideology of peace, love, and harmony. But when you are confronted with a posse of mediocrity one needs to shake it up, speak up, and cause a little pain or you're not doing your job.
I would suggest we all keep open minds and LISTEN to the substance of the discussion in politics and not as much on the delivery and appearance. While I know that political marketing, mob spin, the press, and our wonderful leaders have a tone and an specified bandwidth we should fall all within, breakout and rise above the noise to comprehend the Substance.
Friday, July 24, 2015
More Environmental Leadership in Government
In a perfect world for me government staff would constantly be bringing up ideas and programs to reduce pollution, support renewable energy, and promote a more sustainable world. In a little less perfect world I would be surrounded by elected officials that would pursue and push staff for a strong environmental agenda for government and citizens to follow. But in the real world developing strong environmental strategies as a core program simply draws more flies than human acceptance.
I have been driving an electric zero emission Nissan Leaf for 3.5 years now and have saved thousands in gas dollars. Since our electricity comes from mostly nuclear plants and to some degree renewable energy the use of my car puts out no emission where I use it and much smaller amounts globally when compared to all fossil fuel vehicles.
Over the last few years solar power subsides have been available that promotes a return on capital that exceeds the best financial investment returns. Finally, last year our LCFPD staff realized this opportunity and is currently doing their due diligence to install our first active solar electric system. Lake County is being pulled along by the Forest Preserve action and hopefully will follow in 2016 if subsides are still intact.
During the past several discussions with Lake County leaders on strategic policies all environmental initiatives are qualified by "if economically feasible". Do we qualify Economic Opportunities, if economically feasible, health and resilient communities, reduce congestion, transportation, and public safety IF it is Economically Feasible? No, just our value of a sustainable environment is qualified. While myself, Sandy Hart, and a few others fight for Lake County Leaders to stand up and provide a stronger leadership position on sustainability, I hear the rhetoric from our administrator Barry Burton and many fellow board members demonstrate that sustainability is NOT as important as those other core values.
The reason I am calling for more folks to consider running for public office is we need stronger leadership in government not only sustainable in a more efficient and consolidated government, but also one that pushes for environmentally sustainable programs that provide leadership for clean water, air, and retention of more green capital. I hear current Lake County Elected officials speaking about our open green space as prime opportunities for transportation, manufacturing, office space, and residential development instead of supporting existing infrastructure and towns that have empty commercial structures and foreclosures. It is a Classic example of suburban sprawl instead of the great revitalization projects happening in urban areas around the world that promotes more sustainability. Being sustainable is being fiscally conservative. Conservation and sustainable practices will reduce taxation and promote a better life in Lake County. Step up, provide leadership and think about public service.
I have been driving an electric zero emission Nissan Leaf for 3.5 years now and have saved thousands in gas dollars. Since our electricity comes from mostly nuclear plants and to some degree renewable energy the use of my car puts out no emission where I use it and much smaller amounts globally when compared to all fossil fuel vehicles.
Over the last few years solar power subsides have been available that promotes a return on capital that exceeds the best financial investment returns. Finally, last year our LCFPD staff realized this opportunity and is currently doing their due diligence to install our first active solar electric system. Lake County is being pulled along by the Forest Preserve action and hopefully will follow in 2016 if subsides are still intact.
During the past several discussions with Lake County leaders on strategic policies all environmental initiatives are qualified by "if economically feasible". Do we qualify Economic Opportunities, if economically feasible, health and resilient communities, reduce congestion, transportation, and public safety IF it is Economically Feasible? No, just our value of a sustainable environment is qualified. While myself, Sandy Hart, and a few others fight for Lake County Leaders to stand up and provide a stronger leadership position on sustainability, I hear the rhetoric from our administrator Barry Burton and many fellow board members demonstrate that sustainability is NOT as important as those other core values.
The reason I am calling for more folks to consider running for public office is we need stronger leadership in government not only sustainable in a more efficient and consolidated government, but also one that pushes for environmentally sustainable programs that provide leadership for clean water, air, and retention of more green capital. I hear current Lake County Elected officials speaking about our open green space as prime opportunities for transportation, manufacturing, office space, and residential development instead of supporting existing infrastructure and towns that have empty commercial structures and foreclosures. It is a Classic example of suburban sprawl instead of the great revitalization projects happening in urban areas around the world that promotes more sustainability. Being sustainable is being fiscally conservative. Conservation and sustainable practices will reduce taxation and promote a better life in Lake County. Step up, provide leadership and think about public service.
Sunday, July 12, 2015
Don't waste Democracy! Empower Responsive & Effective Leadership
How do we live in a more responsive nation when it comes to our governments ability to treat us fairly and implement policy that supports our families and neighbors lives. Democracy has been a tool not used by enough citizens in our nation and our neighborhoods. Your right to express yourself and promote your thoughts on governance, taxation, and governmental powers needs to be exercised.
Many elections come and go without any real debate or candidates that are required to exchange ideas and policy. While personally having drawn competition in every consolidated and general election I participated in since 1990, we just saw a Mayoral, City Council, and several other local and County races that were unopposed. Bottom line is that people are refusing to participate in our democracy. Many good contributors to our communities will not run for political office.
Current times demand creative thinking and a change in governmental structure to carry us forward. To have a detached and polarized connection to our democracy and government will only allow continued dysfunction and much higher taxes.
Running for local offices such as County Board, City Council, Park District, and School Districts can be done without being tortured by a mass marketing campaign against yourself and family. Running for County wide, State, or Federal office is another matter and does require a sophisticated marketing approach for success, but you can attract professional support at this level if your message is remarkable.
Without independent citizens willing to run for office, we are asking for mediocrity and the existing politico's hand picked replacements to continue on current governmental policy failures. So, step-up and discuss these matters with friends and neighbors. Public service can be rewarding and is a obligation to citizens to have a successful democracy. Waste not, run for office or cultivate a constructive dialog with neighbors to get good candidates to run for office.
Many elections come and go without any real debate or candidates that are required to exchange ideas and policy. While personally having drawn competition in every consolidated and general election I participated in since 1990, we just saw a Mayoral, City Council, and several other local and County races that were unopposed. Bottom line is that people are refusing to participate in our democracy. Many good contributors to our communities will not run for political office.
Current times demand creative thinking and a change in governmental structure to carry us forward. To have a detached and polarized connection to our democracy and government will only allow continued dysfunction and much higher taxes.
Running for local offices such as County Board, City Council, Park District, and School Districts can be done without being tortured by a mass marketing campaign against yourself and family. Running for County wide, State, or Federal office is another matter and does require a sophisticated marketing approach for success, but you can attract professional support at this level if your message is remarkable.
Without independent citizens willing to run for office, we are asking for mediocrity and the existing politico's hand picked replacements to continue on current governmental policy failures. So, step-up and discuss these matters with friends and neighbors. Public service can be rewarding and is a obligation to citizens to have a successful democracy. Waste not, run for office or cultivate a constructive dialog with neighbors to get good candidates to run for office.
Saturday, July 04, 2015
Grateful Dead, Memories, & Independence Day
While I am not a deadhead, I did experience a few slices of their history with the band at the UPTOWN theater working for Jam Productions, 1978-81. As a crew member, spotlight operator, and Master Electrician, their shows were not just one night stands of wham bam thank you maam. They came in for several days with their entourage and set up camp. When other bands mostly played one night and maybe treated the crew to some swag (a tee shirt), the Grateful Dead served us Steak with all the trimmings, cold Heineken beer, and overall were very hospitable before each show. It was far more like joining the party then a job. I also remember hearing rumors that they loved playing the Uptown Theater and had conversations to purchase the venue.
Remembering moments onstage and off with fellow members of the stage crew, roadies, staff, and members of the band are priceless and live on in my memories. I can't think back on those times without remembering our fallen Local #2 Brother Mark Shapiro and his insane life on and off the stage, but I must say we had good times and he always put a smile on our faces.
Watching the video from Soldiers Field on the "Fare Thee Well" Tour of the Grateful Dead, it brought me back to the Uptown Theater and thoughts of our independence of spirit and body. While Independence does not usually foster truth, perfection or joy, it does give us the freedom to create our own destiny and make our own choices. Happy 4th of July Everybody... 2015. Wishing all a Joyous Holiday.
Remembering moments onstage and off with fellow members of the stage crew, roadies, staff, and members of the band are priceless and live on in my memories. I can't think back on those times without remembering our fallen Local #2 Brother Mark Shapiro and his insane life on and off the stage, but I must say we had good times and he always put a smile on our faces.
Watching the video from Soldiers Field on the "Fare Thee Well" Tour of the Grateful Dead, it brought me back to the Uptown Theater and thoughts of our independence of spirit and body. While Independence does not usually foster truth, perfection or joy, it does give us the freedom to create our own destiny and make our own choices. Happy 4th of July Everybody... 2015. Wishing all a Joyous Holiday.
Tuesday, June 30, 2015
Tax Freeze is only way to Property Tax Relief
When I ran for the County Board a few years ago, I did so only to continue my pursuit of governmental consolidation and efficiency. I did so knowing it was a steep hill to climb and to accomplish this task my fellow Lake County Board Members and State Legislators would have to step up to the plate and be bold in taking on old political practices that keep taking more money from our citizens pockets.
My attempt to save Lake County Property Tax payers an estimated 4.4 million by Eliminating 18 Township Assessors has been slowed down considerably because my fellow Lake County Board members do not want to promote this obvious reduction in property taxes and create a better assessment system. You think Politics? Really? The Board has made it clear that the Governor and/or Legislators would need to take a lead on this issue to move forward but again refused to take any position on this reform. I will continue to drill down on data with our assessors to promote correct facts as long as the County Board will permit.
Other County functions that need study and have promise of tax savings are restructuring/consolidating offices like the Recorder of Deeds, County Clerk, Treasurer, and Coroner. Even though I was promised by some we would look into these issues, to date, very little work has taken place on these efficiencies.
Unified and properly sized school districts have barely moved over the past few decades and continue to be the largest burden on property taxes.
Pensions and other benefit packages for politician's and staff still need work to become more realistic to market conditions, but only baby steps have been taken on this front.
Bottom line is local government needs a reality check to get with the program and find new ways of cooperation and consolidation. Politicians that won't budge and refuse to change should be voted out of office immediately. Citizens need to run for office and challenge the old and new guard if they continue to remain stagnant.
One way of stopping increases in taxes and levies from governments is to freeze the levy so local governments are forced to find ways to maintain services without simply spending more. I am hoping the Governor an Legislators do continue to push on this front because I do find local politicians are in denial and refuse to show the leadership needed to support our residents and create a sustainable governance model.
My attempt to save Lake County Property Tax payers an estimated 4.4 million by Eliminating 18 Township Assessors has been slowed down considerably because my fellow Lake County Board members do not want to promote this obvious reduction in property taxes and create a better assessment system. You think Politics? Really? The Board has made it clear that the Governor and/or Legislators would need to take a lead on this issue to move forward but again refused to take any position on this reform. I will continue to drill down on data with our assessors to promote correct facts as long as the County Board will permit.
Other County functions that need study and have promise of tax savings are restructuring/consolidating offices like the Recorder of Deeds, County Clerk, Treasurer, and Coroner. Even though I was promised by some we would look into these issues, to date, very little work has taken place on these efficiencies.
Unified and properly sized school districts have barely moved over the past few decades and continue to be the largest burden on property taxes.
Pensions and other benefit packages for politician's and staff still need work to become more realistic to market conditions, but only baby steps have been taken on this front.
Bottom line is local government needs a reality check to get with the program and find new ways of cooperation and consolidation. Politicians that won't budge and refuse to change should be voted out of office immediately. Citizens need to run for office and challenge the old and new guard if they continue to remain stagnant.
One way of stopping increases in taxes and levies from governments is to freeze the levy so local governments are forced to find ways to maintain services without simply spending more. I am hoping the Governor an Legislators do continue to push on this front because I do find local politicians are in denial and refuse to show the leadership needed to support our residents and create a sustainable governance model.
Monday, May 25, 2015
Assessors meetings discuss real data
After receiving the staff report that projected a 4.4 million dollar savings by centralizing our assessment process and eliminating the 18 township elected assessors, our Chairman Aaron Lawlor scheduled 6 meetings with all the townships to discuss data, process, and governance outcomes. The Lake County staff that produced the report has not participated and we will be going back to committee in early June to get permission to engage them.
I attended all six meetings with Township Assessors, Supervisors, almost all fellow County Board Members, and other affected employees. The majority of the discussions were positive and constructive on pursuing accurate data, best practices, and unified standards across the county. Since our staff has not been taking part in these discussions I am very anxious to hear their response.
Much of these first discussions centered around the true cost levied upon the citizens for the 18 assessors. The county study pinned that number at approximately 8.2 million based on budget data that was available. Townships levy taxes for both the Supervisor and Assessors together. While they have two separate budget documents, some of the costs for assessors is within the Supervisors budget such as the Assessors salary. In these meetings the townships took the positions that real expenditures should be the basis of cost, not the budgeted numbers. This has created a bit of a apples vs. oranges comparison that does muddy the water. The true cost to our citizens is what is the assessors budgeted cost that is levied? That is the true cost to taxpayers! Anyway, I am hopeful future meetings will nail these costs down. The assessors preliminary expenditure numbers have been around 7.1 million, 1.1 million less than Lake County staffs preliminary 8.2 projections. But again this is projected budgeted numbers vs. preliminary expenditures so more work needs to be done before any real determination can take place. So at this point I have no reason to believe the staff report projections are inaccurate.
The second concern of the assessors was the projected staffing of the centralized county system. The townships believed that with their analysis of actual work loads and the data from the county's surveying, the County's actual projected staff levels with a centralized operation and associated costs would rise. Again, our staffs response is crucial to final determination.
The third major issue discussed was the impact on the citizens and the customer service at the local level. While we do envision an assessment presence throughout the county we have not yet evaluated the programming on having a local presence. As I explained at the meetings, I thought there would be two levels of customer service, one topical and the second more professional. For example we could partner with township supervisors or municipal clerks to be a place for citizens to fill out exemption and senior freeze forms. They could also print out basic assessment information that could be received online. At a more professional level we could use some of the vacated space of our existing townships to have permanent/roaming satellite places for a local presence of Lake County assessment staff. Now, these are just my initial thoughts and as this discussion continues, ideas will turn into actual recommendations with hard numbers. I am however not expecting these costs to be substantial compared to the existing 18 township office currently filled with assessment personnel.
Other issues of consistency and accuracy were discussed with the assessors voicing concern of time and examination of local neighborhoods under a centralized system. They did however agree for the most part that there were issues of different assessment values across township lines that negatively affected taxpayers.
More work needs to be done to refine data as a first step and then it is up to our state legislators to pursue remedies for Lake County to follow. As I said at the meetings, we need to be prepared with accurate data and costs before the State legislature moves on this issue. We all need to position ourselves to be constructive partners in the process of legislation that will provide best practice and the most efficient governance.
I attended all six meetings with Township Assessors, Supervisors, almost all fellow County Board Members, and other affected employees. The majority of the discussions were positive and constructive on pursuing accurate data, best practices, and unified standards across the county. Since our staff has not been taking part in these discussions I am very anxious to hear their response.
Much of these first discussions centered around the true cost levied upon the citizens for the 18 assessors. The county study pinned that number at approximately 8.2 million based on budget data that was available. Townships levy taxes for both the Supervisor and Assessors together. While they have two separate budget documents, some of the costs for assessors is within the Supervisors budget such as the Assessors salary. In these meetings the townships took the positions that real expenditures should be the basis of cost, not the budgeted numbers. This has created a bit of a apples vs. oranges comparison that does muddy the water. The true cost to our citizens is what is the assessors budgeted cost that is levied? That is the true cost to taxpayers! Anyway, I am hopeful future meetings will nail these costs down. The assessors preliminary expenditure numbers have been around 7.1 million, 1.1 million less than Lake County staffs preliminary 8.2 projections. But again this is projected budgeted numbers vs. preliminary expenditures so more work needs to be done before any real determination can take place. So at this point I have no reason to believe the staff report projections are inaccurate.
The second concern of the assessors was the projected staffing of the centralized county system. The townships believed that with their analysis of actual work loads and the data from the county's surveying, the County's actual projected staff levels with a centralized operation and associated costs would rise. Again, our staffs response is crucial to final determination.
The third major issue discussed was the impact on the citizens and the customer service at the local level. While we do envision an assessment presence throughout the county we have not yet evaluated the programming on having a local presence. As I explained at the meetings, I thought there would be two levels of customer service, one topical and the second more professional. For example we could partner with township supervisors or municipal clerks to be a place for citizens to fill out exemption and senior freeze forms. They could also print out basic assessment information that could be received online. At a more professional level we could use some of the vacated space of our existing townships to have permanent/roaming satellite places for a local presence of Lake County assessment staff. Now, these are just my initial thoughts and as this discussion continues, ideas will turn into actual recommendations with hard numbers. I am however not expecting these costs to be substantial compared to the existing 18 township office currently filled with assessment personnel.
Other issues of consistency and accuracy were discussed with the assessors voicing concern of time and examination of local neighborhoods under a centralized system. They did however agree for the most part that there were issues of different assessment values across township lines that negatively affected taxpayers.
More work needs to be done to refine data as a first step and then it is up to our state legislators to pursue remedies for Lake County to follow. As I said at the meetings, we need to be prepared with accurate data and costs before the State legislature moves on this issue. We all need to position ourselves to be constructive partners in the process of legislation that will provide best practice and the most efficient governance.
Sunday, May 17, 2015
Will You Step Forward?
A few weeks ago I wrote in my blog about saving 4.4 million by changing to a Centralized Assessment System in Lake County. I provided a Lake County Report and Power Point that discussed a Centralized System in Lake County that would eliminate 18 Township Assessors and produce 4.4 million in savings. Like all positive change in this world, it does not come without some negative outcomes that challenges ourselves and our relationships with others. Pain will simply be an unintended consequence as we move forward in transitioning government to align our citizens ability and willingness to produce revenues to support governmental service structures. But it is our job as elected officials to present choices that will produce overall good for our residents and remain sustainable so we can provide needed core services for the future. It is the Citizen's job to support or reject those choices. Citizens make those choices by referendum or voting for a candidate. More information from articles in Tribune / News Sun and Daily Harold.
Strongly supporting open space preservation through purchases, land use petition conditions, and easements, I was constantly faced with rational and reasoning of why we should not or could not save the land for nature and our citizens. Reasons included too much money, not a priority, land should be developed for economic growth, not governments job, strangers will be allowed on lands, people will be harmed or killed, and on and on and on. . . . . . Bottom line is there will always be reasons put forward by good well intentioned folks not to do the right thing or make change. But open lands would have not been saved without challenging objectors and protecting our core value of saving open lands by promoting positive reasons to make it happen.
I have chose to move forward and create positive change, will you? As we move forward on this discussion of Centralized Assessments in Lake County, I need you to raise your voice in support by emailing, calling, and participating in the public process. You need to step forward and continue to express your concern about high property taxes and demand your elected representatives do more to reduce the tax burden placed upon you. It can be done through constructive dialog and cooperation.
Just like the objectors to the Open Space discussion people will come up with many reasons not to proceed. Don't let them stop the discussion. The League of Women Voters of Highland Park had proposed a study on the viability of township government but unfortunately some league members STOPPED that study dead in its tracks. Objectors to reform in government will again blame the schools for your taxes and will say this reform will produce only a small savings on your property taxes. While there is some truth to those assertions, reform across all governments including the 4.4 million projected savings by elimination of Township Assessors should move forward as a viable starting point for providing a less burdensome taxation and removal of waste for our residents.
So Will You Step Forward and help support my efforts on Township Assessor Elimination and save 4.4 million for Lake County?
Strongly supporting open space preservation through purchases, land use petition conditions, and easements, I was constantly faced with rational and reasoning of why we should not or could not save the land for nature and our citizens. Reasons included too much money, not a priority, land should be developed for economic growth, not governments job, strangers will be allowed on lands, people will be harmed or killed, and on and on and on. . . . . . Bottom line is there will always be reasons put forward by good well intentioned folks not to do the right thing or make change. But open lands would have not been saved without challenging objectors and protecting our core value of saving open lands by promoting positive reasons to make it happen.
I have chose to move forward and create positive change, will you? As we move forward on this discussion of Centralized Assessments in Lake County, I need you to raise your voice in support by emailing, calling, and participating in the public process. You need to step forward and continue to express your concern about high property taxes and demand your elected representatives do more to reduce the tax burden placed upon you. It can be done through constructive dialog and cooperation.
Just like the objectors to the Open Space discussion people will come up with many reasons not to proceed. Don't let them stop the discussion. The League of Women Voters of Highland Park had proposed a study on the viability of township government but unfortunately some league members STOPPED that study dead in its tracks. Objectors to reform in government will again blame the schools for your taxes and will say this reform will produce only a small savings on your property taxes. While there is some truth to those assertions, reform across all governments including the 4.4 million projected savings by elimination of Township Assessors should move forward as a viable starting point for providing a less burdensome taxation and removal of waste for our residents.
So Will You Step Forward and help support my efforts on Township Assessor Elimination and save 4.4 million for Lake County?
Saturday, May 02, 2015
Ben E. King and musical transformation on us
As I am well into my 23rd year in government I am hoping that my fellow electeds will stand by me on pursuing governmental reform. I think about all the progress we can make for our citizens when contemplating all these opportunities up on the roof. As we work through all the issues we face in government and are faced with challenges to increase taxes, fees, and not changing governments structure, please save the last dance for me and let us stay true to our citizens by reforming, consolidating, and always searching for efficiencies. I keep waiting for that magic moment when we all fall in a harmonious rhythm of positive change.
Music can deliver us to moments and places we love and need. Rest in Peace Ben E King.
Music can deliver us to moments and places we love and need. Rest in Peace Ben E King.
Saturday, April 25, 2015
Elimination of 18 Township Assessors saves 4.4 Mil.
Elimination of the 18 Township Assessors in Lake County will save a projected 4.4 million out of the current 10.2 million in Lake County Assessment Costs to our taxpayers. A recent report released to the RRL Committee of the Lake County Board by staff projected a Centralized Assessment System, operated by Lake County, would provide value uniformity, accuracy, local customer service, and cost reduction from a current average of $32/parcel to a projected $22.27/parcel (4.4 Million in savings). Link to April 8th presentation at RRL.
This study was based on surveying the best practices and award winning assessment systems nationwide and comparing them to our current 18 Township Assessor/Lake County system. The results were clear that our current township assessment system is old, archaic, and simply a waste of taxpayer money. The conversion to a Centralized Assessment System is usually legislated statewide such as Indiana in 2009 (Indiana policy examination enclosed in our Lake County report). Lake County is positioned well to operate a Centralized Assessment System because of our current and advanced networked appraisal system. For this reason I have suggested that Lake County be a county pilot program for the State of Illinois.
Short history of this process is that during our 2013 budget discussions I had asked our Chief Assessor if we had the best practice for assessments in Lake County? The answer was NO. In 2014 I asked and was given unanimous support from our RRL (Revenue, Records, and Legislation) Committee to have staff research the assessment issue for best practices and report back to committee. The released April 2015 report verifies this government waste and demonstrates how we can consolidate government, eliminate 18 assessors and units of government, and provide a much better assessment system for Lake County residents.
Challenges: Politics, political structures, and political relationships will be a huge hurtle to moving forward with this reform. As this process aligns with the re-election of 2/3rds of the Lake County Board my fellow members are feeling the heat. I am sure our County Board will stand up to the political pressure and fight for our residents. Our State legislators Ed Sullivan (Assessor and State Representative), Sen. Melinda Bush, Sen. Terry Link, and my Sen. Julie Morrison have all demonstrated support to me for reforming the system and eliminating Township Assessors.
Process: I am hoping that myself and other board members will meet with our Township Assessors and Supervisors to discuss and flush out how we can best serve our citizens on this matter. We need open, transparent, frank, and constructive dialog to trim government waste and provide the best ideas on a transformation to a Centralized Assessment System . I would also look to provide employment opportunities for many township employees that would be displaced into our Lake County government. Working with Supervisors, we could provide satellite places for citizens to have local assessment contacts. After some initial discussions with stakeholders the plan is to return to RRL for further direction. Diane Hewitt, Chairman of RRL has been very helpful in facilitating this process. I am also looking forward to the engagement of our elected officials and government organizations throughout Lake County to increase communications and provide important feedback to our County Board. Over this summer I will be working with our State Legislators and fellow County Board Members to support legislation that will enable elimination of the 18 Township Assessors. In this legislation we will need to also eliminate the Assessor part of the Township tax levy and transfer the needed portion of the levy to the County to realize the 4.4 million in taxpayer relief and support the centralized assessment system.
While this is not an easy task, it can be done if the County Board members stand up for our citizens and work with our State legislators to eliminate these wasteful units of government. Please contact me at 8474566933 or email at smandel@lakecountyil.gov for more information or if you wish to help.
This study was based on surveying the best practices and award winning assessment systems nationwide and comparing them to our current 18 Township Assessor/Lake County system. The results were clear that our current township assessment system is old, archaic, and simply a waste of taxpayer money. The conversion to a Centralized Assessment System is usually legislated statewide such as Indiana in 2009 (Indiana policy examination enclosed in our Lake County report). Lake County is positioned well to operate a Centralized Assessment System because of our current and advanced networked appraisal system. For this reason I have suggested that Lake County be a county pilot program for the State of Illinois.
Short history of this process is that during our 2013 budget discussions I had asked our Chief Assessor if we had the best practice for assessments in Lake County? The answer was NO. In 2014 I asked and was given unanimous support from our RRL (Revenue, Records, and Legislation) Committee to have staff research the assessment issue for best practices and report back to committee. The released April 2015 report verifies this government waste and demonstrates how we can consolidate government, eliminate 18 assessors and units of government, and provide a much better assessment system for Lake County residents.
Challenges: Politics, political structures, and political relationships will be a huge hurtle to moving forward with this reform. As this process aligns with the re-election of 2/3rds of the Lake County Board my fellow members are feeling the heat. I am sure our County Board will stand up to the political pressure and fight for our residents. Our State legislators Ed Sullivan (Assessor and State Representative), Sen. Melinda Bush, Sen. Terry Link, and my Sen. Julie Morrison have all demonstrated support to me for reforming the system and eliminating Township Assessors.
Process: I am hoping that myself and other board members will meet with our Township Assessors and Supervisors to discuss and flush out how we can best serve our citizens on this matter. We need open, transparent, frank, and constructive dialog to trim government waste and provide the best ideas on a transformation to a Centralized Assessment System . I would also look to provide employment opportunities for many township employees that would be displaced into our Lake County government. Working with Supervisors, we could provide satellite places for citizens to have local assessment contacts. After some initial discussions with stakeholders the plan is to return to RRL for further direction. Diane Hewitt, Chairman of RRL has been very helpful in facilitating this process. I am also looking forward to the engagement of our elected officials and government organizations throughout Lake County to increase communications and provide important feedback to our County Board. Over this summer I will be working with our State Legislators and fellow County Board Members to support legislation that will enable elimination of the 18 Township Assessors. In this legislation we will need to also eliminate the Assessor part of the Township tax levy and transfer the needed portion of the levy to the County to realize the 4.4 million in taxpayer relief and support the centralized assessment system.
While this is not an easy task, it can be done if the County Board members stand up for our citizens and work with our State legislators to eliminate these wasteful units of government. Please contact me at 8474566933 or email at smandel@lakecountyil.gov for more information or if you wish to help.
Sunday, February 15, 2015
New 112 Schools and property surplus must produce efficiencies with other governments
School District 112 is in the mist of reducing their school structures so they can be more sustainable for the long term. School District 113 has been upgrading the high schools and is hiring a new superintendent. The Park District has leased the Highland Park Country Club and is going over their long term capital plan to look at their facilities in respect to needs of our residents.
As we are moving forward through 2015 and beyond it is time for all governments to think globally as we face continued economic challenges and restructure in a way that can reduce costs by looking to share facilities, administration, and services that are in common. So, one might ask where are the services in common with Park Districts (HP, HWD, Drfd), School Districts (HP, HWD, Drfd), and for the heck of it throw in the City's of Highland Park, Highwood, and Deerfield. OR maybe any smaller grouping you might imagine. We have to ask ourselves what services or functions any, all, or additional local governments have in common.
Obviously, schools are more aligned with schools, city's with city's, and parks with parks, but still all have functions that are similar. Maintenance and custodial service of structures and grounds is common to all. Administration and management structures, basic office support services, electronic hardware, and communication equipment are all duplicated. For most, they have finance departments, human resources, legal, and some sort of negotiations with unions. Public safety overshadows all governments and communities. No rocket scientist needed for this exploration and demonstration, just the will to proceed with analysis and consolidation.
Lets start with one facility to be home for two or more of our governments to reduce costs. Shared parking, shared phone bank, shared copy machines, shared tech, shared kitchens, shared restrooms, and shared office help. Along with the reduced cost of one building, you have professional leaders together under one roof where they can hopefully work together on future joint operations and efficiency. We need to start somewhere to change our culture to more align with our sustainability values.
Choice here in my opinion is we can proactively move forward on these efficiencies now voluntarily or be forced to in the near future as revenues continue to be reduced by a failing State government and a overburdened tax base. Let's Move On It.....now!
As we are moving forward through 2015 and beyond it is time for all governments to think globally as we face continued economic challenges and restructure in a way that can reduce costs by looking to share facilities, administration, and services that are in common. So, one might ask where are the services in common with Park Districts (HP, HWD, Drfd), School Districts (HP, HWD, Drfd), and for the heck of it throw in the City's of Highland Park, Highwood, and Deerfield. OR maybe any smaller grouping you might imagine. We have to ask ourselves what services or functions any, all, or additional local governments have in common.
Obviously, schools are more aligned with schools, city's with city's, and parks with parks, but still all have functions that are similar. Maintenance and custodial service of structures and grounds is common to all. Administration and management structures, basic office support services, electronic hardware, and communication equipment are all duplicated. For most, they have finance departments, human resources, legal, and some sort of negotiations with unions. Public safety overshadows all governments and communities. No rocket scientist needed for this exploration and demonstration, just the will to proceed with analysis and consolidation.
Lets start with one facility to be home for two or more of our governments to reduce costs. Shared parking, shared phone bank, shared copy machines, shared tech, shared kitchens, shared restrooms, and shared office help. Along with the reduced cost of one building, you have professional leaders together under one roof where they can hopefully work together on future joint operations and efficiency. We need to start somewhere to change our culture to more align with our sustainability values.
Choice here in my opinion is we can proactively move forward on these efficiencies now voluntarily or be forced to in the near future as revenues continue to be reduced by a failing State government and a overburdened tax base. Let's Move On It.....now!
Saturday, January 31, 2015
You can lead a horse to water but can't make him/her drink it!
The problem in politics and attempting to provide leadership on reform is that it is not just one horse that you are trying to lead to water. Also, your not quite sure where the water is since you are usually in a valley and can't see over the hill. What makes it even worse is that your not quite sure you will find clean drinkable water over the hill or if water is what you really need first since you have a little with you in storage and there are many other needs. Now, with that being said why even try to lead them horses to water? We are not bone dry yet and things aren't all that bad as we sit here today. Well, we all know we need clean water to survive and as strategic planners and stewards of Lake County we need to be proactive.
All us politicians proclaim we are working to make government efficient, not waste or steal money, and combing over dollars so we spend money like you would if you were sitting in our chairs. For myself directly representing the 34,000 folks in Highland Park, Highwood, and Deerfield, and being part of a consensus governing 703,000 folks in Lake County, defining the acceptable reform expectations is like trying to catch a greased pig. Let me even go further and say that even DISCUSSING setting the bar of expectations for reform is elusive.
Now the PROBLEM is as you look at property taxes they have kept rising year after year yet our property values have diminished substantially. While our administrators and us politian's have been talking about 2 to 4 % increases in our tax levy, in relation to our property values the reality has been much higher. Several pieces of legislation were proposed downstate to tie these factors together but failed to amended the tax cap law accordingly. Since the economic pull back in 2009, governments have continued to increase operating costs at a ratio that is outpacing the revenue stream and citizens ability to pay. More residents in Illinois are leaving our state than any other and Lake County has declined in population over the past several years.
I am hearing many of my fellow members were upset with me that I have suggested that I am the only one on this board seemingly willing to take the bull by the horns in a comprehensive manner to restructure government in Lake County and reduce taxes. If I am wrong and others believe we should pursue REDUCED taxation by providing leadership and example in Lake County government let me hear. Don't attempt to steer me though a maze that leads to delay and noncommittal. Join me in creating a work plan and process that can provide professional and comprehensive solutions. I only serve my citizens to try to make a difference and represent them as I have promised. . . Like it or not, this has been me for the 22 years I have been a public servant.
Bottom line is that I do work with many smart good folks that are in this deeply grooved government trend of status quo. They believe that we are doing the best we can for the citizens. Lake County government is rated very high like most our school districts, municipalities, and other districts, but needs to work together to integrate and create real reform. Time is a ticken and we are taking a lickin but together we can make the difference needed to better serve our citizens. YOU IN?
All us politicians proclaim we are working to make government efficient, not waste or steal money, and combing over dollars so we spend money like you would if you were sitting in our chairs. For myself directly representing the 34,000 folks in Highland Park, Highwood, and Deerfield, and being part of a consensus governing 703,000 folks in Lake County, defining the acceptable reform expectations is like trying to catch a greased pig. Let me even go further and say that even DISCUSSING setting the bar of expectations for reform is elusive.
Now the PROBLEM is as you look at property taxes they have kept rising year after year yet our property values have diminished substantially. While our administrators and us politian's have been talking about 2 to 4 % increases in our tax levy, in relation to our property values the reality has been much higher. Several pieces of legislation were proposed downstate to tie these factors together but failed to amended the tax cap law accordingly. Since the economic pull back in 2009, governments have continued to increase operating costs at a ratio that is outpacing the revenue stream and citizens ability to pay. More residents in Illinois are leaving our state than any other and Lake County has declined in population over the past several years.
I am hearing many of my fellow members were upset with me that I have suggested that I am the only one on this board seemingly willing to take the bull by the horns in a comprehensive manner to restructure government in Lake County and reduce taxes. If I am wrong and others believe we should pursue REDUCED taxation by providing leadership and example in Lake County government let me hear. Don't attempt to steer me though a maze that leads to delay and noncommittal. Join me in creating a work plan and process that can provide professional and comprehensive solutions. I only serve my citizens to try to make a difference and represent them as I have promised. . . Like it or not, this has been me for the 22 years I have been a public servant.
Bottom line is that I do work with many smart good folks that are in this deeply grooved government trend of status quo. They believe that we are doing the best we can for the citizens. Lake County government is rated very high like most our school districts, municipalities, and other districts, but needs to work together to integrate and create real reform. Time is a ticken and we are taking a lickin but together we can make the difference needed to better serve our citizens. YOU IN?
Wednesday, January 28, 2015
Wake up Lake County and lets get to work on Reform !
Being on the County Board for over two years now I have greatly appreciated the other members I share the decision making process with up in Waukegan. But like other political groups and governmental entities throughout our country this one is really no different when it comes to making real change. Now unlike what we seem to observe at the federal level, county elected officials do share a level of warmth between us. I do not criticize my fellow members for not having the same governmental integration expectations that I would like to see occur. I do however believe our citizens are demanding a big change and would like to see governmental burdens reduced substantially. I guess the main difference between my fellow members and I is that I do believe that we can reorganize government agencies in Lake County with the help of State government to reduce taxation and provide the services our residents require.
In trying to push forward our agenda of intergovernmental integration, countywide equity, and general reforms to create efficiencies I have yet to find ONE real partner that is willing to fight to reduce the property tax burden on our citizens. There is simply a high level of chatter on process that is without real vested heroes to lead and very little example of successes that have occurred to date.
All my pleas of forming a working committee and retaining experts have fallen on seemingly deaf ears. While each government is complex in our existing framework of 3 times the amount of agencies than mostly any other state in the union, the daunting prospect of consolidating services under less agencies and creating sustaining efficiencies seems to rattle existing professional administrations, thus paralyzing the top elected officials into taking just taking baby steps that simply do not produce any outcomes that our citizens are demanding.
Without elected champions at the table to work staff on these important issues there is no fire set with staff to accomplish any real progress on the reform issue. Along with no real action taking place the debate on "realistic goals" and staff overload dominates the chatter in the back rooms paralyzing any chance of success on a comprehensive process and substantial progress.
The problem I am having creating any real change in government is that being a new member, a democrat, and a progressive, I am seemingly a flea on the tail of this wagging dog called Lake County with no real short term hope of meeting the expectations our citizens are demanding.
That doesn't however prevent me from continuing to speak up and trying to convince my fellow members and community elected officials from getting on board.... Stay Tuned!!!
In trying to push forward our agenda of intergovernmental integration, countywide equity, and general reforms to create efficiencies I have yet to find ONE real partner that is willing to fight to reduce the property tax burden on our citizens. There is simply a high level of chatter on process that is without real vested heroes to lead and very little example of successes that have occurred to date.
All my pleas of forming a working committee and retaining experts have fallen on seemingly deaf ears. While each government is complex in our existing framework of 3 times the amount of agencies than mostly any other state in the union, the daunting prospect of consolidating services under less agencies and creating sustaining efficiencies seems to rattle existing professional administrations, thus paralyzing the top elected officials into taking just taking baby steps that simply do not produce any outcomes that our citizens are demanding.
Without elected champions at the table to work staff on these important issues there is no fire set with staff to accomplish any real progress on the reform issue. Along with no real action taking place the debate on "realistic goals" and staff overload dominates the chatter in the back rooms paralyzing any chance of success on a comprehensive process and substantial progress.
The problem I am having creating any real change in government is that being a new member, a democrat, and a progressive, I am seemingly a flea on the tail of this wagging dog called Lake County with no real short term hope of meeting the expectations our citizens are demanding.
That doesn't however prevent me from continuing to speak up and trying to convince my fellow members and community elected officials from getting on board.... Stay Tuned!!!
Sunday, November 30, 2014
The Marketing of Politicians never Sleeps
Most of us have been overwhelmed with the marketing of politicians during elections. Negative commercials and mailers littering our mailboxes and minds with the trash of professional marketers has become intolerable in recent years. I am totally sick of it. It is just way too much and has turned off many voters and citizens that have been feeling helpless to make a difference.
After any given contested election the negative blast subsides and is replaced by the constant branding of positive marketing of our elected officials demonstrating the same type veneer that lacks any real substance. The old days of the published picture hugging the baby and appearances at public events has been vastly enhanced by displaying these events through modern media market options available, reaching out to the masses. Creating, sharing, and building valuable databases of voters for our newsletters and electronic media accounts is a solid catapult for projecting any willing politician as one hell of a great human being and public servant. Involvement and acceptance within not for profits and professional organizations, neighborhood labeled groups, and movements of day all provide an excellent bed for marketing propaganda that is designed for a positive communication link to the citizens. Now using this communication tool is not bad at its face value but it is just a face value.
Creating positive constructive change in government takes courage, makes people unsettled, and doesn't always make for great media coverage. Standing on the backs of prior champions, celebrating past successes that has carried us through today, can't overshadow the work and challenges we need to face now.
I have always been frustrated by politicians using an effective marketing plan to project an image of substantial accomplishment when in fact the substance of practice has not been remarkable. As we move forward facing unprecedented challenges as government officials, citizens need to look past the marketing branding and focus on results and outcomes that prove the effectiveness of representation.
After any given contested election the negative blast subsides and is replaced by the constant branding of positive marketing of our elected officials demonstrating the same type veneer that lacks any real substance. The old days of the published picture hugging the baby and appearances at public events has been vastly enhanced by displaying these events through modern media market options available, reaching out to the masses. Creating, sharing, and building valuable databases of voters for our newsletters and electronic media accounts is a solid catapult for projecting any willing politician as one hell of a great human being and public servant. Involvement and acceptance within not for profits and professional organizations, neighborhood labeled groups, and movements of day all provide an excellent bed for marketing propaganda that is designed for a positive communication link to the citizens. Now using this communication tool is not bad at its face value but it is just a face value.
Creating positive constructive change in government takes courage, makes people unsettled, and doesn't always make for great media coverage. Standing on the backs of prior champions, celebrating past successes that has carried us through today, can't overshadow the work and challenges we need to face now.
I have always been frustrated by politicians using an effective marketing plan to project an image of substantial accomplishment when in fact the substance of practice has not been remarkable. As we move forward facing unprecedented challenges as government officials, citizens need to look past the marketing branding and focus on results and outcomes that prove the effectiveness of representation.
Friday, August 29, 2014
Update on Governance Reform Leadership.
A colleague on the Board has told me many times that she constantly feels like she is just one hand clapping and I do get it. But for her and I it does not mean we will stop trying to move forward on better governance models in representation of our citizenry. Sometimes we do get people to pay attention and act through perseverance.
When I got elected to these boards I committed to working on creating more efficiencies in Lake County. Our Chairman held round tables with local leaders to listen to their concerns and suggestions on cooperation. One of the low hanging fruit was 911 dispatch and public safety radio communications county wide. We are currently starting to implement, expand, and update these communications and are offering a very low cost buy in for all local governments within Lake County.
Within the County Board and Forest Preserve (we wear both hats) we want to create efficiencies and also provide leadership at the County level as to reduce the citizens burden from all levels of government. While we analyze and implement joint operations between the forest preserve and county, we have also discussed elimination of segregated and outdated units of governments. We have started to research the elimination of local assessors as well as weighed the consolidation of the County Clerk and Recorder of Deeds. Do we need an elected Treasurer or can our professional finance director deal with those obligations? I am a strong believer in professional government where us elected folks create policy and hire professionals to carry out operations. Outcomes from a governance efficiency process can save millions of taxpayers dollars and provide quality services to our residents. Automation, managerial government models, and elimination of political jobs can help us move forward.
Currently on the finance committee we are looking at compensation to employees which is about 70% of our operating budget. The triad of our employee compensation is a salary, health benefits, and pension. While the pension (IMRF) is mostly controlled by the state, we control salary and health benefits. In a compensation study we have found that some employees are underpaid, our pension is a MASSIVE benefit, and healthcare reform is in transition at all levels of business and government. Digging into health insurance has been a challenge for me and the finance committee. Best practice shared with our citizenry should be our level of benefit at the government level. Bottom line is we can provide a quality benefit package that treats both our employees and residents with respect and fairness. Work in Progress!!!
Also, when it comes to many changes in government structure, state legislative action is required. It would be my preference to allow for a binding referendum for our citizens to make the choice with the facts researched and presented to them. I am hopeful you will see something coming from the County Board in 2016. Stay tuned!!
When I got elected to these boards I committed to working on creating more efficiencies in Lake County. Our Chairman held round tables with local leaders to listen to their concerns and suggestions on cooperation. One of the low hanging fruit was 911 dispatch and public safety radio communications county wide. We are currently starting to implement, expand, and update these communications and are offering a very low cost buy in for all local governments within Lake County.
Within the County Board and Forest Preserve (we wear both hats) we want to create efficiencies and also provide leadership at the County level as to reduce the citizens burden from all levels of government. While we analyze and implement joint operations between the forest preserve and county, we have also discussed elimination of segregated and outdated units of governments. We have started to research the elimination of local assessors as well as weighed the consolidation of the County Clerk and Recorder of Deeds. Do we need an elected Treasurer or can our professional finance director deal with those obligations? I am a strong believer in professional government where us elected folks create policy and hire professionals to carry out operations. Outcomes from a governance efficiency process can save millions of taxpayers dollars and provide quality services to our residents. Automation, managerial government models, and elimination of political jobs can help us move forward.
Currently on the finance committee we are looking at compensation to employees which is about 70% of our operating budget. The triad of our employee compensation is a salary, health benefits, and pension. While the pension (IMRF) is mostly controlled by the state, we control salary and health benefits. In a compensation study we have found that some employees are underpaid, our pension is a MASSIVE benefit, and healthcare reform is in transition at all levels of business and government. Digging into health insurance has been a challenge for me and the finance committee. Best practice shared with our citizenry should be our level of benefit at the government level. Bottom line is we can provide a quality benefit package that treats both our employees and residents with respect and fairness. Work in Progress!!!
Also, when it comes to many changes in government structure, state legislative action is required. It would be my preference to allow for a binding referendum for our citizens to make the choice with the facts researched and presented to them. I am hopeful you will see something coming from the County Board in 2016. Stay tuned!!
Tuesday, August 19, 2014
When Should Government Hide discussion's?
Sitting on the Lake County Board and Forest Preserve Board, we rarely go into closed session unless we are voting on a lawsuit settlement, dealing with salaries for an individual, or making an offer to buy land. This is in stark contrast to my time on the City Council of Highland Park when we spent many hours every week talking about issues that might graze subjects of personnel, (probable or filed) litigation, or land sale.
Many times over my 20 years on the City Council I protested against going into closed session. I believed that many of the Highland Park Theater discussions were policy, should have been in open, did not jeopardize the city, and were not appropriate for closed session.
The States Attorneys office of Lake County represents the County Board and Holland and Knight is the City of Highland Park's legal representation. Many of the same kind of issues we discussed at the City of Highland Park in closed session is talked about in open session at the County Board. My impression is that the States Attorney has a very high bar to go into closed session while Holland and Knights appears to me very liberal and allows a much larger bandwidth of discussions to occur. Along with compliance of the Open Meetings Act, my opinion has always been if it does not injure the public body (corporation), or an individual, we should not be in closed session.
The Highland Park Country Club discussion amongst the City Council should be fully discussed in open public sessions and not be held in any closed session meetings. After all, the Park District and City both have the same public and therefore any discussion or facts on this matter would not adversely effect us. All these public discussions would do is allow us to be informed and give public comment. I would ask that all discussions in the future on these matters be put on the agenda and held in public. Also, discussions and policy of what we want at the HP Theater site should also be as open as possible. Not something drummed up in closed session and given to us pre-baked.
Furthermore, I would suggest that the tapes from these closed session past meetings be offered to the Lake County States Attorney or the Attorney General of the State of Illinois to review and give a legal opinion if in fact there has been compliance of the Open Meetings Act. I think this would be a good exercise for all our public bodies to be sure our local governments are complying. There can be immunity given to those participating so no one would go to jail for past offenses if there was non-compliance to the open meeting act.
Many times over my 20 years on the City Council I protested against going into closed session. I believed that many of the Highland Park Theater discussions were policy, should have been in open, did not jeopardize the city, and were not appropriate for closed session.
The States Attorneys office of Lake County represents the County Board and Holland and Knight is the City of Highland Park's legal representation. Many of the same kind of issues we discussed at the City of Highland Park in closed session is talked about in open session at the County Board. My impression is that the States Attorney has a very high bar to go into closed session while Holland and Knights appears to me very liberal and allows a much larger bandwidth of discussions to occur. Along with compliance of the Open Meetings Act, my opinion has always been if it does not injure the public body (corporation), or an individual, we should not be in closed session.
The Highland Park Country Club discussion amongst the City Council should be fully discussed in open public sessions and not be held in any closed session meetings. After all, the Park District and City both have the same public and therefore any discussion or facts on this matter would not adversely effect us. All these public discussions would do is allow us to be informed and give public comment. I would ask that all discussions in the future on these matters be put on the agenda and held in public. Also, discussions and policy of what we want at the HP Theater site should also be as open as possible. Not something drummed up in closed session and given to us pre-baked.
Furthermore, I would suggest that the tapes from these closed session past meetings be offered to the Lake County States Attorney or the Attorney General of the State of Illinois to review and give a legal opinion if in fact there has been compliance of the Open Meetings Act. I think this would be a good exercise for all our public bodies to be sure our local governments are complying. There can be immunity given to those participating so no one would go to jail for past offenses if there was non-compliance to the open meeting act.
Saturday, August 16, 2014
City Council should hand over Country Club to Park District
After the City Council worked with the Park District for decades on providing quality amenities for the citizens of Highland Park things have polarized between the City and Park District. Government efficiency is not only consolidation of operations and efficiency of services for the residents, it is also about cooperation and melding of ideas between governmental entities. Trust and being on the same team is important. Lets work together people....
The City Council worked with the Park District on buying lands and building facilities like the Aqua Park, Driving Range, and the new recreation center.
In 1993 we originally bought the Highland Park Country Club (HPCC) because a large housing development had been proposed that would have devastated the flood plain and open space. Current Council people have wrongly professed the City bought it to save the golf course. The purchase was never about saving a golf course and in fact the City of Highland Park should not be in the golf and banquet business. The Council had operated the golf course to use net revenue to offset part of the bond payments. The Park District would have purchased the HPCC but were prohibited from borrowing money due to "Tax Cap". Since the City was "home rule" we had the authority to save this property for open space. The cost was 10 million for the HPCC purchase and the 20 year bonds (about 700k/year in debt service) were fully paid in January of 2013.
Through the years we had identified 100k-300k for repayment of debt service from this enterprise HPCC fund. As the golf business tanked after the turn of the century this debt service repayment pretty much evaporated as the business continued to shrink. When the Park District needed to build a new recreation center the HPCC site was chosen because the commitment to hand it over. The HPCC would be turned over to the Park District upon repayment of bonds by the City or sooner if they would take over a portion of the debt service (100k-300k) on the 20 year bonds. At the time of the recreation center construction the Park District decided to wait until 2013 for taking over the operations but moved forward with us spending about 12 million on a new recreation center based on the fact the property would be under their control in 2013.
Several years ago the Mayor and I sat down with the Park District to discuss the transfer with a brand new Park Board and after a few meetings things seemed like they were on track. At that time we also talked about transitioning the City's Senior and Youth services to the Park District along with the HPCC transfer. More available parking for seniors and the concept of multigenerational programming under one roof seemed like a great way to enhance the Youth and Senior programming.
Upon leaving the City Council for the County Board I recall the Park District telling us they needed to work on a master plan vision before moving forward. We had talked about a decision point to decide which golf course (Sunset or HPCC) they were going to keep open and would survey the business and residents to help facilitate a recommendation.
I believe in early 2014 a decision was made to close the HPCC and resume the transition discussion with the City. The City's position of demanding the HPCC and Banquet facilities stay open was prompted by the Mayor and Councilman Tony Blumberg. To me this demand is totally out of left field, unreasonable, and without merit. This demand immediately short circuited the discussion and trust between the parties making it impossible for the Park District to proceed with their plan to consolidate golf play and liberating this open space for a more passive and environmentally friendly use of the Highland Park Country Club.
The recent article in the Triblocal reporting the huge losses in 2013 are just the tip of the iceberg of losses to be incurred if the City of Highland Park continues operations of the HPCC. Renovations and maintenance of the Golf Course and Facilities will require 100's of thousands in the next several years along with the operations being in direct competition with the Park District's Sunset Golf Course.
The City of Highland Park should not have done a 180 degree policy change, demanding the HPCC golf and banquet facilities stay open and driving intergovernmental cooperation into the ground. Instead, they should come to their senses and work out an agreement with the Park District and remove themselves out of these operations. Allow the Park District to do their job we elected them to do for the citizens of Highland Park.
Greg Totter wrote an article in the Triblocal you should read.....
The City Council worked with the Park District on buying lands and building facilities like the Aqua Park, Driving Range, and the new recreation center.
In 1993 we originally bought the Highland Park Country Club (HPCC) because a large housing development had been proposed that would have devastated the flood plain and open space. Current Council people have wrongly professed the City bought it to save the golf course. The purchase was never about saving a golf course and in fact the City of Highland Park should not be in the golf and banquet business. The Council had operated the golf course to use net revenue to offset part of the bond payments. The Park District would have purchased the HPCC but were prohibited from borrowing money due to "Tax Cap". Since the City was "home rule" we had the authority to save this property for open space. The cost was 10 million for the HPCC purchase and the 20 year bonds (about 700k/year in debt service) were fully paid in January of 2013.
Through the years we had identified 100k-300k for repayment of debt service from this enterprise HPCC fund. As the golf business tanked after the turn of the century this debt service repayment pretty much evaporated as the business continued to shrink. When the Park District needed to build a new recreation center the HPCC site was chosen because the commitment to hand it over. The HPCC would be turned over to the Park District upon repayment of bonds by the City or sooner if they would take over a portion of the debt service (100k-300k) on the 20 year bonds. At the time of the recreation center construction the Park District decided to wait until 2013 for taking over the operations but moved forward with us spending about 12 million on a new recreation center based on the fact the property would be under their control in 2013.
Several years ago the Mayor and I sat down with the Park District to discuss the transfer with a brand new Park Board and after a few meetings things seemed like they were on track. At that time we also talked about transitioning the City's Senior and Youth services to the Park District along with the HPCC transfer. More available parking for seniors and the concept of multigenerational programming under one roof seemed like a great way to enhance the Youth and Senior programming.
Upon leaving the City Council for the County Board I recall the Park District telling us they needed to work on a master plan vision before moving forward. We had talked about a decision point to decide which golf course (Sunset or HPCC) they were going to keep open and would survey the business and residents to help facilitate a recommendation.
I believe in early 2014 a decision was made to close the HPCC and resume the transition discussion with the City. The City's position of demanding the HPCC and Banquet facilities stay open was prompted by the Mayor and Councilman Tony Blumberg. To me this demand is totally out of left field, unreasonable, and without merit. This demand immediately short circuited the discussion and trust between the parties making it impossible for the Park District to proceed with their plan to consolidate golf play and liberating this open space for a more passive and environmentally friendly use of the Highland Park Country Club.
The recent article in the Triblocal reporting the huge losses in 2013 are just the tip of the iceberg of losses to be incurred if the City of Highland Park continues operations of the HPCC. Renovations and maintenance of the Golf Course and Facilities will require 100's of thousands in the next several years along with the operations being in direct competition with the Park District's Sunset Golf Course.
The City of Highland Park should not have done a 180 degree policy change, demanding the HPCC golf and banquet facilities stay open and driving intergovernmental cooperation into the ground. Instead, they should come to their senses and work out an agreement with the Park District and remove themselves out of these operations. Allow the Park District to do their job we elected them to do for the citizens of Highland Park.
Greg Totter wrote an article in the Triblocal you should read.....
Monday, January 27, 2014
As the Temp Drops Anxiety Rises!
Highland Park, Lake County, TV stations, and politicians galore have developed a practice of notifications that warn us of snow events and low temperatures. Our weather people dramatically display events and warn us all to take cover and not leave home at least once a month.
I have chosen to not put up the warning flag every time it snows more than 4 inches or when the temp falls below zero. Is it just me that remembers 30+ inches of snow on the ground in winter and temperatures below zero for weeks? Am I that old?
Yes, the past decade has been pretty light on snow and cold but there is no need to panic! The world is not coming to an end and we need to turn down the level of anxiety drummed up by the media. The professional media and individuals on the web need to step back and let us enjoy the four seasons without panic and stress.
Yes, let people know where they can get help and let them know the resources we have as a normal practice but lets not keep sounding sirens every week. All will be fine and we will survive.
I have chosen to not put up the warning flag every time it snows more than 4 inches or when the temp falls below zero. Is it just me that remembers 30+ inches of snow on the ground in winter and temperatures below zero for weeks? Am I that old?
Yes, the past decade has been pretty light on snow and cold but there is no need to panic! The world is not coming to an end and we need to turn down the level of anxiety drummed up by the media. The professional media and individuals on the web need to step back and let us enjoy the four seasons without panic and stress.
Yes, let people know where they can get help and let them know the resources we have as a normal practice but lets not keep sounding sirens every week. All will be fine and we will survive.
Here are Weather Resources available to you
Check Local Road Conditions and Traffic with Lake County PASSAGE
Take a moment to check www.lakecountypassage.com for live, local traffic information and make your drive easier. You can view a map of road conditions and events, including crashes, stalls, debris, and other roadway incidents, and see camera images of major intersections across Lake County. You can also sign up for customized email alerts or listen to 1620 AM radio. I-Phone and Android users can also download PASSAGE apps. PASSAGE: 847-377-7000
Alert Lake County
Alert Lake County is your emergency preparedness resource. Find out how you and your family can be prepared for emergencies.
Sign up for Lake County Emergency Alerts on Twitter
Take a moment to check www.lakecountypassage.com for live, local traffic information and make your drive easier. You can view a map of road conditions and events, including crashes, stalls, debris, and other roadway incidents, and see camera images of major intersections across Lake County. You can also sign up for customized email alerts or listen to 1620 AM radio. I-Phone and Android users can also download PASSAGE apps. PASSAGE: 847-377-7000
Alert Lake County
Alert Lake County is your emergency preparedness resource. Find out how you and your family can be prepared for emergencies.
Sign up for Lake County Emergency Alerts on Twitter
National Weather Service
National Weather Service Warnings/Watches/Advisories (Chicago area)
Thursday, December 26, 2013
One Government One People
The title is a little over simplification because the issue is very complex . . .but many governments for one people is just a big waste of resources and the taxpayers money. If this was a simple nut to crack I would have been more successful over the years but EGO's and entrenched redundant services blanket all of our region. I have been told that the level of service and respect that Highland Park or Deerfield or Lake Forest give their citizens could not be achieved in consolidation. HOGWASH! We have very similar operations with high expectations in every community. How about CONTROL and governance over any consolidations? Does anybody think that any of us really have control over the day to day operations we currently enjoy? We hire professionals to deal with those matters and their performance data is examined in a timely manner by our elected policy makers. If performance is not achieved than a professional change is made. The major change would be the savings of tax dollars spent on redundant buildings, administrations, vehicles, and small inefficient networks.
The discussion and implementation of government efficiency has been spouted by almost all public officials yet reorganizations of the unsustainable government frameworks are virtually unchanged.
Should I care if my public works, police, fire, development, or administration says Highland Park, OR ACME ? ? Does it trouble us it does not say Ravinia, Moraine, Woodridge, Braeside, Highlands or Sunset? Highland Park has a population of under 30,000 and other towns nearby have from a few thousand to about twenty thousand. Highland Park covers about 12.5 square miles and others a little bigger and smaller. Lake County, the government that I represent, has about 700,000 people in in and around 51 incorporated communities.
Now there have been a few issues over the years where my opinions might not be shared by a majority of residents and I would like to hear from you on this matter. Would it trouble you if one of Highland Park's departments were shared with Deerfield, Highwood, Lake Forest, Bannockburn, Lincolnshire and/or Lake Bluff? You have to ask yourself how many 10 million dollar jails/communication centers do we need for 50,000 people or 100,000 people? What is the best practice? Can we combine governments under one roof ?
Yes, some redundant government jobs will be lost, but can we keep people living in our communities that just can pay anymore taxes and fees? I am hopeful that our County Chairman will move forward in 2014 on this discussion and allow us to reach out for partners to study new governance models in Lake County. Let me know your thoughts.
The discussion and implementation of government efficiency has been spouted by almost all public officials yet reorganizations of the unsustainable government frameworks are virtually unchanged.
Should I care if my public works, police, fire, development, or administration says Highland Park, OR ACME ? ? Does it trouble us it does not say Ravinia, Moraine, Woodridge, Braeside, Highlands or Sunset? Highland Park has a population of under 30,000 and other towns nearby have from a few thousand to about twenty thousand. Highland Park covers about 12.5 square miles and others a little bigger and smaller. Lake County, the government that I represent, has about 700,000 people in in and around 51 incorporated communities.
Now there have been a few issues over the years where my opinions might not be shared by a majority of residents and I would like to hear from you on this matter. Would it trouble you if one of Highland Park's departments were shared with Deerfield, Highwood, Lake Forest, Bannockburn, Lincolnshire and/or Lake Bluff? You have to ask yourself how many 10 million dollar jails/communication centers do we need for 50,000 people or 100,000 people? What is the best practice? Can we combine governments under one roof ?
Yes, some redundant government jobs will be lost, but can we keep people living in our communities that just can pay anymore taxes and fees? I am hopeful that our County Chairman will move forward in 2014 on this discussion and allow us to reach out for partners to study new governance models in Lake County. Let me know your thoughts.
Thursday, December 19, 2013
The Emailed "On The Table" Newsletter will be replaced by Tweets of this Blog
Over the past 10 or 15 years I have been sending out emailed political newsletters. Because I have a Lake County Newsletter published every few weeks I figured that enough was enough and not to also send out my political rag (On The Table).
I have heard from many folks how much they liked my sharp tonged babble, when not pointing at them, and were disappointed that I was not sending it out.
The "On the Table" Newsletter has been a snapshot of this blog for many years. I am thinking a way to get my opinions out to a wider audience is to send tweets out when I publish on my blog. If folks want to be a follower of @StevenWMandel at twitter they can and will be notified of my "On The Table" rants real time......
I will send out one blast in the near future to let folks know of the new plan and those whom might want to follow can sign up.... STEVE
Friday, November 15, 2013
Proposal to increase city property taxes 4.85% is scary and wrong
Update- the revised tax levy was just double tax cap at 4.85 %
During the 20 years I served on the city council (1993-2012) we had a budget policy that limited increases in our property tax levy at or below the Illinois Tax Cap percentage. Even though we were a home rule community that was not limited by tax cap, we chose to lead by example and keep our property tax increase at or many times below the Illinois Tax Cap. In recent years after the recession, the City Councils I served on choose to freeze the levy to help homeowners recover from great equity losses and income reductions. The proposition that our property values have decreased dramatically yet taxes continue to skyrocket has to be stopped. We do not live for our governments, they are suppose to support us with realistic taxation.
It is absurd for this Council to ask citizens to pony up 85 dollars more per 500k value. Instead of the current attitude of beginning with how much the government needs as business as usual we need to have compassion for the citizenry, understand their tax payment capacity, and provide services and government accordingly.
Instead of bragging about large increases in spending on infrastructure and public safety with no regard for cost, we need to start with a cap on spending and do whatever it takes to build a responsible budget that services the needs of our community, not the wants of a few.
To blame this all on the State is wrong. We can hire less people, negotiate less benefits, or even outsource if labor costs stay unreasonable. The City Councils I sat on had positioned ourselves to make significant progress in this realm and I was hopeful the future government would keep steering in this sustainable path. To throw your hands up, blame the State, and further burden our citizens is not the answer. Yes, there are hard choices to make for future operations of our governments, not just the City of Highland Park.
Step One - Protect the Taxpayers and Citizens. Step Two - Live within our means and pull back spending. Step Three - Respect past commitments to our employees and create a new framework for future labor that is sustainable within the economy we have before us. It should not always be the Taxpayer footing the bill but rather employees too sharing in the pains of the downturned economy. This can be done in cooperation and a fair benefit package for our employees that respects the contributions of the citizenry.
Do not raise our taxes and pursue remedies that will reduce the escalating economic pressures on the residents of our communities.
During the 20 years I served on the city council (1993-2012) we had a budget policy that limited increases in our property tax levy at or below the Illinois Tax Cap percentage. Even though we were a home rule community that was not limited by tax cap, we chose to lead by example and keep our property tax increase at or many times below the Illinois Tax Cap. In recent years after the recession, the City Councils I served on choose to freeze the levy to help homeowners recover from great equity losses and income reductions. The proposition that our property values have decreased dramatically yet taxes continue to skyrocket has to be stopped. We do not live for our governments, they are suppose to support us with realistic taxation.
It is absurd for this Council to ask citizens to pony up 85 dollars more per 500k value. Instead of the current attitude of beginning with how much the government needs as business as usual we need to have compassion for the citizenry, understand their tax payment capacity, and provide services and government accordingly.
Instead of bragging about large increases in spending on infrastructure and public safety with no regard for cost, we need to start with a cap on spending and do whatever it takes to build a responsible budget that services the needs of our community, not the wants of a few.
To blame this all on the State is wrong. We can hire less people, negotiate less benefits, or even outsource if labor costs stay unreasonable. The City Councils I sat on had positioned ourselves to make significant progress in this realm and I was hopeful the future government would keep steering in this sustainable path. To throw your hands up, blame the State, and further burden our citizens is not the answer. Yes, there are hard choices to make for future operations of our governments, not just the City of Highland Park.
Step One - Protect the Taxpayers and Citizens. Step Two - Live within our means and pull back spending. Step Three - Respect past commitments to our employees and create a new framework for future labor that is sustainable within the economy we have before us. It should not always be the Taxpayer footing the bill but rather employees too sharing in the pains of the downturned economy. This can be done in cooperation and a fair benefit package for our employees that respects the contributions of the citizenry.
Do not raise our taxes and pursue remedies that will reduce the escalating economic pressures on the residents of our communities.
Saturday, October 26, 2013
Open Letter on Higher Densities in HP Downtown
Dear Mayor, City Council, and Commissioners,
I would
suggest that staff recommendations to increase unit densities from 15 units per
acre up to 81 units and increase height from 40 feet to 60 is extreme over kill
and reflective of zonings only seen in larger cities or other towns that have
very little in common with the culture and values of Highland Park. One does
not need a sledge hammer to our zoning when a minor adjustment was requested to
modestly increase residential use of the CBD area.
In the
current B4 district (which was the intended focus of this study) 30 to 40 units
per acre with a 4th story (which is set back) is enough of an
increase to tweak future residential build out.
The concept
of modestly increasing density within a similar historic vision and bulk of our
town center is reasonable. The proposed changes from the staff are not and need
to be rejected as proposed. It was also notable that a traffic and retail
capacity studies of this area, whether done in the past or present were not
considered. Highland Park’s lack of major arterial connections has always
played a major factor in the analysis of future growth capacity. This capacity
directly relates to our enjoyment. I
again suggest a modest adjustment instead of the promotion of the significant
changes proposed by staff. If one was to
hold public meetings across the city on this issue the response would be very similar
to mine. Please call me if you wish to
discuss.
Wednesday, October 09, 2013
Early Voting and Election Day Polling Place Changes
The Highland Park police station located on 1677 Old Deerfield Road will be the New Early Voting Site, replacing the Community Health Center on Green Bay Road. There will be plenty of parking and space for voters to get in and out quickly.
At the request of North Shore School District 112, we have also moved election day voting sites from Red Oak School, Ravinia School, and Lincoln School. To replace school sites we have added more precincts to Ravinia Festival, transferred some to a new Immaculate Conception site, and will also use the Police Station on election day. All new sites have plenty of parking and will provide easy access.
Our County Clerk Willard Helander has been a great help responding to the requests from our schools. Willard had her staff work with Mayor Rotering and myself to provide good polling place alternatives for election day and early voting. The change in the early voting site will accommodate easier access to more citizens and provide opportunities for future efficiencies during our county election process.
More information will be forthcoming from our County Clerk and our local towns in the near future but wanted to give everyone a heads up since the Lake County Board approved the changes on Tuesday.
Saturday, August 17, 2013
Representation as a Lake County Board Member and LCFPD Commish
My County Board and Forest Preserve District 11 is most of Highland Park, all of Highwood, and one neighborhood in Deerfield. While I do reach out to our municipal leaders and citizens in District 11 as my primary responsibility, representation does not end at the district border.
I am proud to represent everyone of our 704,000 folks in Lake County and am one of 21 on these boards that are responsible for their health, welfare, safety, and enjoyment of our County. While approximately 75,000 folks are not represented by a municipality live under our protection, land use, and authority, they are mostly part of a community ruled by one or several municipalities within proximity of their residence or business.
We need to be harmonious with those municipalities and encompassing communities that our unincorporated residents and business live and operate within. Sometimes ordinances and laws we might enact are not perfect for all our unincorporated residents since Lake County communities do not live under the same laws. At these times we must come up with a consensus that best serves all our residents even though it is not perfect.
A good example of this came at our August board meeting where I supported video gaming in Lake County (vote was 11-9 in favor). Unincorporated Lake County tavern business owners were unfairly prohibited from having video gaming while many of the North and Western municipalities had legalized video gaming within their boundaries. Competing taverns that could have these machines were as close as across the street. Revenues and demand put our unincorporated business owners in jeopardy since clients wanted an option to play these games.
The State of Illinois legalized video gaming several years ago unless a municipal authority objected within their borders. When the State passed this law the County enacted an ordinance to prohibit video gaming in Lake County hoping that municipalities would follow. Unfortunately, many have recently revoked prohibiting laws and are now allowing video gaming causing us to deal with the matter.
Highland Park, Highwood, and Deerfield are not directly impacted by this decision since video gaming is currently prohibited.
However, I am also a County Board member for all the unincorporated business owners and was proud to help them stay in business, provide for their families, and keep their employees working.
I am proud to represent everyone of our 704,000 folks in Lake County and am one of 21 on these boards that are responsible for their health, welfare, safety, and enjoyment of our County. While approximately 75,000 folks are not represented by a municipality live under our protection, land use, and authority, they are mostly part of a community ruled by one or several municipalities within proximity of their residence or business.
We need to be harmonious with those municipalities and encompassing communities that our unincorporated residents and business live and operate within. Sometimes ordinances and laws we might enact are not perfect for all our unincorporated residents since Lake County communities do not live under the same laws. At these times we must come up with a consensus that best serves all our residents even though it is not perfect.
A good example of this came at our August board meeting where I supported video gaming in Lake County (vote was 11-9 in favor). Unincorporated Lake County tavern business owners were unfairly prohibited from having video gaming while many of the North and Western municipalities had legalized video gaming within their boundaries. Competing taverns that could have these machines were as close as across the street. Revenues and demand put our unincorporated business owners in jeopardy since clients wanted an option to play these games.
The State of Illinois legalized video gaming several years ago unless a municipal authority objected within their borders. When the State passed this law the County enacted an ordinance to prohibit video gaming in Lake County hoping that municipalities would follow. Unfortunately, many have recently revoked prohibiting laws and are now allowing video gaming causing us to deal with the matter.
Highland Park, Highwood, and Deerfield are not directly impacted by this decision since video gaming is currently prohibited.
However, I am also a County Board member for all the unincorporated business owners and was proud to help them stay in business, provide for their families, and keep their employees working.
Fairness For All Citizens of Lake County
I have been on the County Board and Forest Preserve District for about 8 months now and really appreciate my colleagues from all districts. Every one of them has shown me sincerity and the ability to bring positive voices to the table. The diversity of culture, age, history, and political views is much broader than my public service experience in Highland Park.
At the Forest Preserve we are entering a strategic planning process to identify our future direction and set priorities for development, land acquisition, and operations. At the County we are moving forward with our 2014 budget and awaiting the presentation from staff.
One thing that strikes you when you get involved in county government and forest preserves is the difference in needs and services throughout the county. Also, the county serves as a pass through for federal and state dollars focused on housing, health care, and job training to name a few.
We also have several special service districts where we take direct taxes and fees for services like sewers and water. We contract other services with municipalities as well to provide greater efficiency
and lower cost to taxpayers.
Now, over the next five years we have budgeted over 550 million dollars on roads and transportation for county roads. While this is funded from ALL residents throughout Lake County the money is spent mostly on county roads. As we move forward in our budget process we need to change our policy to allow a fair share of monies to construct and maintain transportation infrastructure in parts of the county that are currently serviced by municipalities. While I agree that county money should be spent on regional networks of roads, bridges, and pedestrian ways, they should not be required to be owned by the County to receive funding. Does it make sense that a large portion of citizens in the county should pay twice as much for transportation as others for the same service?
The forest preserve has over 50 million left in funding from the referendum money of land acquisition and development. This money has to be spent within the next several years to satisfy current laws governing these bonds. How can we integrate the mission of the forest preserve to help us fund open space, recreation, and natural preservation in areas that have again not received a fair share. Hopefully we can work to bring the mission of the forest preserve in name and substance to all of us throughout the county in a more equitable manner.
Money going out of districts throughout the county should in a large part have direct benefit to those in those districts. The Lake County Forest Preserve and Lake County get about 11 percent of your property taxes. That is the same amount as the City and Park District combined yet who is responsible for transportation, open space, land preservation, and recreation where you live. In several municipal areas throughout the county the imbalance is huge and we need to bring fairness to all citizens of the County so ALL get their fair share.
I hope to make some progress on this issue of fairness to all in the next coming months. Change is not easy and many think that current practices are the best choices but with all due respect I ask for change. I am encouraged by the thoughtfulness and big picture outlook I have seen from many on the board. All of us represent our district as well as ALL the residents of the County. I have personally stepped up for other areas in this county far from Highland Park and ask my fellow Board Members to consider my comments and join me in fairness for all on taxation and delivery of service.
At the Forest Preserve we are entering a strategic planning process to identify our future direction and set priorities for development, land acquisition, and operations. At the County we are moving forward with our 2014 budget and awaiting the presentation from staff.
One thing that strikes you when you get involved in county government and forest preserves is the difference in needs and services throughout the county. Also, the county serves as a pass through for federal and state dollars focused on housing, health care, and job training to name a few.
We also have several special service districts where we take direct taxes and fees for services like sewers and water. We contract other services with municipalities as well to provide greater efficiency
and lower cost to taxpayers.
Now, over the next five years we have budgeted over 550 million dollars on roads and transportation for county roads. While this is funded from ALL residents throughout Lake County the money is spent mostly on county roads. As we move forward in our budget process we need to change our policy to allow a fair share of monies to construct and maintain transportation infrastructure in parts of the county that are currently serviced by municipalities. While I agree that county money should be spent on regional networks of roads, bridges, and pedestrian ways, they should not be required to be owned by the County to receive funding. Does it make sense that a large portion of citizens in the county should pay twice as much for transportation as others for the same service?
The forest preserve has over 50 million left in funding from the referendum money of land acquisition and development. This money has to be spent within the next several years to satisfy current laws governing these bonds. How can we integrate the mission of the forest preserve to help us fund open space, recreation, and natural preservation in areas that have again not received a fair share. Hopefully we can work to bring the mission of the forest preserve in name and substance to all of us throughout the county in a more equitable manner.
Money going out of districts throughout the county should in a large part have direct benefit to those in those districts. The Lake County Forest Preserve and Lake County get about 11 percent of your property taxes. That is the same amount as the City and Park District combined yet who is responsible for transportation, open space, land preservation, and recreation where you live. In several municipal areas throughout the county the imbalance is huge and we need to bring fairness to all citizens of the County so ALL get their fair share.
I hope to make some progress on this issue of fairness to all in the next coming months. Change is not easy and many think that current practices are the best choices but with all due respect I ask for change. I am encouraged by the thoughtfulness and big picture outlook I have seen from many on the board. All of us represent our district as well as ALL the residents of the County. I have personally stepped up for other areas in this county far from Highland Park and ask my fellow Board Members to consider my comments and join me in fairness for all on taxation and delivery of service.
Sunday, August 04, 2013
Commissioner Applications.... for "Election Commission"
Update- We won a preliminary injunction to allow our Clerk to administer the elections and prevent Judge Foreman from appointing an election commission. So, why I appreciate those of you that applied, all is on hold until we have our day in court on this issue.
I am hopeful however our state legislators will fix this matter and put it to rest when they return to Springfield removing this "Gotcha" legislation for Lake County...
If we are unsuccessful in stopping this pitiful legislation, HB2418 requires Chief Judge Foreman to appoint a five member "Election Commission" which will over see elections in Lake County.
The News Release issued by Chief Judge Foreman sets forth the process required by law. Applications and other forms are available on the site and must be returned by August 16th to conform to the timeline laid out by the HB2418 legislation.
If you wish to apply for the position of "Election Commissioner" you need to do so immediately to fall within timeline. Requirements prevent those that currently hold elected office or have held an elected office within the last 2 years from being a "Election Commissioner".
Chief Judge Foreman must appoint the five commissioners by end of August and the "Election Board" must be up and running by the end of October.
The New Metra Board must be accountable to citizens
Well, now after the second scandal in just a short time we must demand a big change on how the Metra board does business. While I am not thrilled on how our newly Lake County appointment Norman Carlson has conducted himself the short few months he has been on the board, he does have the expertise to make good decisions. His political and administrative decisions so far have failed us.
Whether this board is totally removed or all resigns, I am hoping collar counties do not lose a voice in the Metra process. Any appointment has a level of politics whether it be the Governor, Mayors, or County Board Chairman. Bottom line is that these jobs should be filled with competent non-political decision makers. If appointees can't be accountable to the citizens maybe the professional staff should just report to currently elected officials quarterly for policy decisions.
Whether this board is totally removed or all resigns, I am hoping collar counties do not lose a voice in the Metra process. Any appointment has a level of politics whether it be the Governor, Mayors, or County Board Chairman. Bottom line is that these jobs should be filled with competent non-political decision makers. If appointees can't be accountable to the citizens maybe the professional staff should just report to currently elected officials quarterly for policy decisions.
Sunday, July 28, 2013
Quinn Costs Lake County residents 100's of thousands of dollars with the stroke of his pen
BIG UPDATE>>> Governor, Now you have a chance to write the wrong since we received a temporary injunction to stop this bad legislation in its tracks. Please push for legislation to remedy this injustice to Lake County ASAP.... This is now again in your hands.. .. .. ..
Governor Quinn did cost Lake County residents a projected $700,000 plus by signing HB 2418 into law. HB2418 requires only Lake County to establish an election commission, an entirely new branch of government. There was No referendum, No Lake County resident discussions, No communication with our Lake County government officials, just a poke in the eye to our residents and our Lake County Clerk by a Renegade State Senator.
As a Lake County Board member and a fellow democrat I am stunned and disappointed at the 1950's politics still used down in Springfield by the so called "Power Brokers" and now condoned by Governor Quinn.
This injustice must not be ignored or allowed to stand. Fighting political bullies like these perpetrators is a must and I will not be silent until this wrong is righted. Stand with us and call your state representatives to protest.... Email or call me for more details.
UPDATE - We have filed suit to attempt to stop this HB2418 legislation from effecting our election process. Governor Quinn as responded that he was justified passing this legislation in total because it enabled Online registration... Would he feel the same about the legislation if they snuck in a law that enabled residents to wear six guns on their side?? Bottom line is this backroom, bullying type of politics that Quinn has endorsed must stop. Support Lake County and let legislators know you are not happy about bullying legislation that just targets Lake County and no one else!
Friday, July 05, 2013
70 MPH on the Tollway sounds good to me.
Traveling across the country in the auto is mostly boring these days and I don't do it too often. Having to slow down to 55, 60, or even 65 is even more grueling. Spending time in New Mexico the interstates are all 75 mph and it is great on making time on long road trips. All of these super highways and interstates are designed to accommodate 75 mph traffic safely.
I was very happy to see the legislature pass the 70 mph allowance in Illinois and am hopeful to see it on all interstates and our tri-state toll way system. While understanding that County's will have a chance to opt out, I don't think this will ever come up for a vote. . . . . . But if it does, I will support the 70 mph speed limit.
I was very happy to see the legislature pass the 70 mph allowance in Illinois and am hopeful to see it on all interstates and our tri-state toll way system. While understanding that County's will have a chance to opt out, I don't think this will ever come up for a vote. . . . . . But if it does, I will support the 70 mph speed limit.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)